Stanowisko Europejskiej Sieci Krajowych Instytucji Praw Człowieka ws. Adama Bodnara Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich

Udostępnij

W Archiwum Wiktora Osiatyńskiego od 2017 roku dokumentujemy, analizujemy i objaśniamy zmiany w zakresie praworządności w Polsce.

Więcej

Europejska Sieć Krajowych Instytucji Praw Człowieka również #MuremzaBodnarem



Joint Statement in Support of the Polish Commissioner for Human Rights

 

We, the undersigned organisations, reiterate our strong support to the Office of the Polish Commissioner for Human Rights (RPO) in its work to promote and protect human rights and equality in Poland in an independent and effective manner.

 

The Polish Commissioner for Human Rights, Dr Adam Bodnar, is currently facing severe backlash from some politicians and segments of the media for speaking up on behalf of the National Prevention Mechanism (NPM) on an individual case.

 

The Polish Commissioner for Human Rights has received serious threats and been subjected to hate speech, including through online smear campaigns, for publicly defending the universal right to a fair trial and the prohibition from inhumane and degrading treatment.

 

The work of the RPO in this case falls squarely within its mandate as an NHRI and must be protected. Moreover, the RPO was designated the task of NPM under the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT) by the parliament , through amending the Law of 15 July 1987 on the RPO.

 

Under the UN Paris Principles, adopted by the UN General Assembly, NHRIs must be granted a broad mandate to promote and protect human rights. This includes the ability to take a position on current events related to human rights, including through public speeches. Furthermore, as Poland has ratified the OPCAT, the RPO has a direct duty to “make recommendations to the relevant authorities with the aim of improving the treatment and the conditions of the persons deprived of their liberty” (Art. 19 b). The UN General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council have consistently emphasised that “national human rights institutions and their respective members and staff should not face any form of reprisal or intimidation, (…) as a result of activities undertaken in accordance with their respective mandates, including when taking up individual cases or when reporting on serious or systematic violations in their countries”.

 

According to the Venice Principles, States shall not only refrain from taking any action aiming at or resulting in the suppression of the Ombudsman Institution or in any hurdles to its effective functioning, but shall also “effectively protect it from any such threats”. 2 Recommendations We call upon all organs of the Republic of Poland to act in line with their State’s long-standing international commitments by applying their powers to protect the RPO, including its staff. We also reiterate the Joint Statement of the Council of Europe, ENNHRI, ODIHR and UN OHCHR in support of the Polish Human Rights Commissioner, released in March 2016. On that occasion, the parties expressed that “there is a broad consensus which recognises the benefits of Poland having an institution of this standing, which enjoys independence and functional immunity and which is therefore able to act impartially to safeguard the rights of individuals”.

 

In November 2017, the RPO was re-accredited with A-status, as being in full compliance with the Paris Principles. The RPO has been operating with a strong commitment to independence in a very adverse environment. Poland should be very proud of having such an independent institution safeguarding human rights and equality for everybody. We stand in solidarity with the Polish Commissioner for Human Rights and his office. A strong, effective and independent NHRI, in compliance with the Paris Principles, is a key element for the promotion and protection of human rights and equality in Poland and in Europe.

 

June 2019

 

ENNHRI, Equinet, GANHRI, IOI, OHCHR Europe

 

ENNHRI, the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions, brings together all 44 European NHRIs to enhance the promotion and protection of human rights in the region. Equinet, the European Network of Equality Bodies, brings together 49 organisations from 36 European countries, which are empowered to counteract discrimination as national equality bodies across a range of grounds.

 

GANHRI, the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions, provides leadership in protecting and advancing human rights worldwide through NHRIs. It is made up of regional networks of NHRIs from Africa, Americas, Asia-Pacific and Europe, representing 112 NHRIs.

 

IOI, the International Ombudsman Institute is the global organisation for the cooperation of more than 190 independent Ombudsman institutions from more than 100 countries worldwide. OHCHR Europe, the Regional Office for Europe is one of the 70+ field presences of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR) around the world working to advance the protection and promotion of human rights for all.

 

The RPO is mandated as an NHRI, National Equality Body, Ombudsman and NPM. It is a member of ENNHRI, Equinet, GANHRI and the IOI.

 

Źródło: ENHRI



Autor


W Archiwum Wiktora Osiatyńskiego od 2017 roku dokumentujemy, analizujemy i objaśniamy zmiany w zakresie praworządności w Polsce.


Więcej

Opublikowany

28 czerwca 2019




Inne głosy w debacie



Inne artykuły tego autora

29.02.2024

To już oficjalne: 137 mld euro z KPO odblokowane

20.02.2024

Jak odbudować państwo prawa w Polsce? Prof. Morijn: Realizm niech przeważa nad puryzmem

17.01.2024

Rząd powinien przywrócić Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka należne miejsce

04.01.2024

Minister Kultury wobec mediów publicznych działał w celu usprawiedliwionym konstytucyjnie [ANALIZA]

04.01.2024

List Otwarty Zarządu Ogólnopolskiego Stowarzyszenia Sędziów Administracyjnych do Prezesa NSA

29.12.2023

Sytuacja w mediach publicznych. RPO Marcin Wiącek pisze do Ministra Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego

27.12.2023

Czego może nas nauczyć kryzys medialny

22.12.2023

Sędzia Przymusiński do dr. Szweda i innych wątpiących: cały czas wisi nad nami problem neosędziów. Zwlekanie z koniecznymi decyzjami niczemu nie służy

18.12.2023

Jak przywrócić w Polsce praworządność? Sędzia Przymusiński: Sejmie, przyjmij te dwie uchwały! [Gazeta Wyborcza]

13.12.2023

Rozliczenie PiS to nie Norymberga. Niesiołowski polemizuje z Matczakiem [Gazeta Wyborcza, Stefan Niesiołowski]

13.12.2023

Dziś znowu mamy prawo do dumy [Gazeta Wyborcza, Adam Michnik]

11.12.2023

Wrzosek: Tylko radykalna naprawa prokuratury. Usunąć ludzi Ziobry, cofnąć awanse, dać niezależność

29.11.2023

Sejm odwoła członków komisji LexTusk. Ale przyszły rząd nie chce jej likwidować

17.11.2023

Piotr Mikuli: W sprawie ewentualnych uchwał Sejmu RP dotyczących dublerów i członków neo-KRS [Konstytucyjny.pl]

16.11.2023

Państwowe spółki przyczyniły się do kryzysu demokracji. Czy prawo może temu zapobiec? [Analiza]

15.11.2023

Izba Kontroli Nadzwyczajnej i Spraw Publicznych w SN nie jest niezależnym sądem [analiza]

14.11.2023

W okresie zmiany rządu nie powinno się podejmować poważnych rozstrzygnięć – apel Komitetu Nauk Prawnych PAN do doktora nauk prawnych

07.11.2023

Schodzimy z naszej reduty, banery zachowujemy [Gazeta Wyborcza, List do redakcji]

02.11.2023

Stanowisko dotyczące znaczenia Deklaracji z Reykjaviku  przyjętej na IV Szczycie Rady Europy

31.10.2023

Nasze demokratyczne grzechy główne, czyli jak poprawić III RP [Gazeta Wyborcza, Marek Beylin]



Wesprzyj nas!

Archiwum Osiatyńskiego powstaje dzięki obywatelom i obywatelkom gotowym bronić państwa prawa.


10 
20 
50 
100 
200