Stanowisko Europejskiej Sieci Krajowych Instytucji Praw Człowieka ws. Adama Bodnara Rzecznika Praw Obywatelskich

Udostępnij

W Archiwum Wiktora Osiatyńskiego od 2017 roku dokumentujemy, analizujemy i objaśniamy zmiany w zakresie praworządności w Polsce.

Więcej

Europejska Sieć Krajowych Instytucji Praw Człowieka również #MuremzaBodnarem



Joint Statement in Support of the Polish Commissioner for Human Rights

 

We, the undersigned organisations, reiterate our strong support to the Office of the Polish Commissioner for Human Rights (RPO) in its work to promote and protect human rights and equality in Poland in an independent and effective manner.

 

The Polish Commissioner for Human Rights, Dr Adam Bodnar, is currently facing severe backlash from some politicians and segments of the media for speaking up on behalf of the National Prevention Mechanism (NPM) on an individual case.

 

The Polish Commissioner for Human Rights has received serious threats and been subjected to hate speech, including through online smear campaigns, for publicly defending the universal right to a fair trial and the prohibition from inhumane and degrading treatment.

 

The work of the RPO in this case falls squarely within its mandate as an NHRI and must be protected. Moreover, the RPO was designated the task of NPM under the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (OPCAT) by the parliament , through amending the Law of 15 July 1987 on the RPO.

 

Under the UN Paris Principles, adopted by the UN General Assembly, NHRIs must be granted a broad mandate to promote and protect human rights. This includes the ability to take a position on current events related to human rights, including through public speeches. Furthermore, as Poland has ratified the OPCAT, the RPO has a direct duty to “make recommendations to the relevant authorities with the aim of improving the treatment and the conditions of the persons deprived of their liberty” (Art. 19 b). The UN General Assembly and the UN Human Rights Council have consistently emphasised that “national human rights institutions and their respective members and staff should not face any form of reprisal or intimidation, (…) as a result of activities undertaken in accordance with their respective mandates, including when taking up individual cases or when reporting on serious or systematic violations in their countries”.

 

According to the Venice Principles, States shall not only refrain from taking any action aiming at or resulting in the suppression of the Ombudsman Institution or in any hurdles to its effective functioning, but shall also “effectively protect it from any such threats”. 2 Recommendations We call upon all organs of the Republic of Poland to act in line with their State’s long-standing international commitments by applying their powers to protect the RPO, including its staff. We also reiterate the Joint Statement of the Council of Europe, ENNHRI, ODIHR and UN OHCHR in support of the Polish Human Rights Commissioner, released in March 2016. On that occasion, the parties expressed that “there is a broad consensus which recognises the benefits of Poland having an institution of this standing, which enjoys independence and functional immunity and which is therefore able to act impartially to safeguard the rights of individuals”.

 

In November 2017, the RPO was re-accredited with A-status, as being in full compliance with the Paris Principles. The RPO has been operating with a strong commitment to independence in a very adverse environment. Poland should be very proud of having such an independent institution safeguarding human rights and equality for everybody. We stand in solidarity with the Polish Commissioner for Human Rights and his office. A strong, effective and independent NHRI, in compliance with the Paris Principles, is a key element for the promotion and protection of human rights and equality in Poland and in Europe.

 

June 2019

 

ENNHRI, Equinet, GANHRI, IOI, OHCHR Europe

 

ENNHRI, the European Network of National Human Rights Institutions, brings together all 44 European NHRIs to enhance the promotion and protection of human rights in the region. Equinet, the European Network of Equality Bodies, brings together 49 organisations from 36 European countries, which are empowered to counteract discrimination as national equality bodies across a range of grounds.

 

GANHRI, the Global Alliance of National Human Rights Institutions, provides leadership in protecting and advancing human rights worldwide through NHRIs. It is made up of regional networks of NHRIs from Africa, Americas, Asia-Pacific and Europe, representing 112 NHRIs.

 

IOI, the International Ombudsman Institute is the global organisation for the cooperation of more than 190 independent Ombudsman institutions from more than 100 countries worldwide. OHCHR Europe, the Regional Office for Europe is one of the 70+ field presences of the UN Human Rights Office (OHCHR) around the world working to advance the protection and promotion of human rights for all.

 

The RPO is mandated as an NHRI, National Equality Body, Ombudsman and NPM. It is a member of ENNHRI, Equinet, GANHRI and the IOI.

 

Źródło: ENHRI



Autor


W Archiwum Wiktora Osiatyńskiego od 2017 roku dokumentujemy, analizujemy i objaśniamy zmiany w zakresie praworządności w Polsce.


Więcej

Opublikowany

28 czerwca 2019





Inne głosy w debacie



Inne artykuły tego autora

08.09.2021

Żona Karola Karskiego z PiS idzie do Sądu Najwyższego. Awans dała jej nowa, polityczna KRS

07.09.2021

KE potwierdza: blokada miliardów dla Polski przez podważanie prawa Unii

07.09.2021

Sędzia Gąciarek odmawia orzekania z neo-sędzią, którego awansowała upolityczniona KRS

07.09.2021

KE wnioskuje do TSUE o kary finansowe dla Polski. Ziobro: „Prawna wojna hybrydowa”

07.09.2021

„Komisarz” Manowska lekceważy głos starych sędziów SN. I prze do wyboru nowego prezesa Izby Cywilnej

06.09.2021

[NA CELOWNIKU] Matura z kodeksem wykroczeń. Piotr Starzewski

06.09.2021

Łętowska: Teraz sędziowie już wiedzą, że słuchanie władzy to łamanie prawa i narażanie podsądnych

06.09.2021

Wolta w Izbie Dyscyplinarnej. Adam Roch nie chciał łamać orzeczeń TSUE

06.09.2021

RPO do Morawieckiego: Po co „bezwzględny, generalny i abstrakcyjny zakaz udostępnienia informacji”?

05.09.2021

To już pewne: KE wstrzyma wypłatę środków województwom, jeśli nie wycofają się z uchwał anty-LGBT

05.09.2021

Izba Dyscyplinarna chce demonstracyjnie złamać orzeczenia TSUE. I bierze się za sędziów SN

04.09.2021

Sędzia zwolniła z aresztu prokuratora, bo immunitet uchyliła mu nielegalna Izba Dyscyplinarna

02.09.2021

[NA CELOWNIKU] Siedlecka na celowniku władz, władza na celowniku Siedleckiej

02.09.2021

Apel: Wolna szkoła, nie partyjna!

02.09.2021

Decyzja Dudy: sędzia Prusinowski nowym prezesem Izby Pracy SN, Manowska „komisarzem” w Izbie Cywilnej

02.09.2021

Stan wyjątkowy. PiS wyrzuca z granicy dziennikarzy, aktywistów, blokuje dostęp do informacji publicznej

02.09.2021

Łętowska dla OKO.press: Nie wierzę w intencje. Stan wyjątkowy to brzytwa w rękach butnej władzy

24.08.2021

Zmiana ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym. Opinia RPO dla Senatu

22.08.2021

[NA CELOWNIKU] W Słowenii premier Janša atakuje media jak Trump. Prawica buduje tam medialne imperium

20.08.2021

[NA CELOWNIKU] Władza się mści, bo ja nazywam to, co się dzieje. „Na celowniku” – prof. Wojciech Sadurski



Wesprzyj nas!

Archiwum Osiatyńskiego powstaje dzięki obywatelom i obywatelkom gotowym bronić państwa prawa.


10 
20 
50 
100 
200